[buddypress-trac] [BuddyPress Trac] #4132: Account activation revamp
buddypress-trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Wed Dec 17 20:34:59 UTC 2014
#4132: Account activation revamp
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: sooskriszta | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Core | Release
Severity: normal | Version: 1.5
Keywords: 2nd-opinion needs-patch dev- | Resolution:
feedback |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by sooskriszta):
Replying to
[https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/buddypress/p1418846234000731 Slack]:
> '''OC2PS''' we have never hashed
[https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4132 it] out. i have heard
that some people have some objections/concerns/reservations. but havent
heard specifically what concerns. i would like to thrash this out and try
to address concerns. and hopefully reach a consensus on whether or not
this ticket makes sense
> '''Boone''': IIRC the primary concern was introducing more friction to
the registration + activation process than already exists
> So it would be nice for the workflow to be configurable by the admin, so
if the admin wanted an in-depth process, they'd be able to have it, or
not.
> But that introduces lots of infrastructure
> '''JJJ''': The one thing I really want is to be able to cherry pick
fields that are required on sign-up.
> I mean... I think we should simplify sign-ups anyways.
> '''Boone''': Yeah, and I'd like to interface with member types
> '''JJJ''': For sure
> That's huge.
ok. just based on the wireframes, there are a couple of clarifications:
- There is always a skip link. so should reduce friction. many popular
social networks follow this model
- Remember, this is not registration. I'm all for minimizing registration.
This ticket goes hand in hand with #5583
- If a component (e.g. group or friends) is not active then it shouldnt
appear as one of the tabs/steps.
Like jjj I would love for admin to be able to cherry pick fields. Not only
here but also on profile summary/cards #4126 But let's not make great the
enemy of the good. If we start without the ability to cherry pick fields
and add that ability later, it wouldn't be such a disaster.
Ditto for interfacing with member types. It's a bit premature to design
FOR something that doesn't exist yet.
--
Ticket URL: <https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4132#comment:50>
BuddyPress Trac <http://buddypress.org/>
BuddyPress Trac
More information about the buddypress-trac
mailing list