Putting it on two lines certainly makes it clearer, though the styles might have to be tweaked a bit to avoid getting too much vertical space above the listing.<br><br>Yes, I've resorted to URL hacking when paging through large item sets. Not the most elegant solution, is it?<br>
<br>
Voyagerfan5761<br>
<a href="http://technobabbl.es/?utm_source=emailmessage&utm_campaign=sigs&utm_medium=email" title="Technobabbles" target="_blank">http://technobabbl.es/</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 17:02, Dan McFarland <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan@29thfloor.com">dan@29thfloor.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">There's 2 different things going on in those examples.<br><br>"Displaying 51-100 of 1200" is referring to the number of items.<br>
<br>"[ 2 ] of 24" is the number of pages.<br><br>I'm wondering how removing "Displaying 51-100 of 1200" makes it less confusing. You could certainly change the pagination to work more like Hulu's and still display the number of items.<br>
<br><i style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Displaying 51-100 of 1200 items</i><br>[<u><<</u>] [<u><</u>] [ 2 ] of 24 [<u>></u>]
<br><br>I do like the idea of being able to type in a specific page number and I agree that the current pagination style doesn't scale very well.<br><br>Daniel McFarland<br><a href="http://www.29thfloor.com" target="_blank">http://www.29thfloor.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div>