[wp-testers] Tested 2.7 threaded comments...

[Frank Bueltge]

Sorry for my bad english!

I have also tested. Works not fine!
Without JavaScritp ist not to be use. I think it is better, it works
also without JS or you hide the "relpy"-link for non javascript.

My next problem is the the xHTML, many errors in the list, 3 exambles:
<li "class=" even"" id="comment-1">

<ul class='children'>
				<li "class=" byuser comment-author-admin bypostauthor odd alt""
id="comment-7">

The function use " and ', why?

Liebe Grüsse
Frank
______________________________
Mein Buch: WordPress - Weblogs einrichten und administrieren | ISBN
978-3-937514-33-8

bueltge.de
kvfl.com



On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:25 AM, DD32 <wordpress at dd32.id.au> wrote:
> Just a note on this:
> It seems setting a depth of 0 currently results in, A depth of zero!, Ie.
> You cannot nest comments at all.
>
> I've got a patch to change it from:
> <?php if ( $depth < $args['depth'] ) echo
> comment_reply_link(array('add_below' => 'div-comment')) ?>
> to
> <?php if ( 0 == $args['depth'] || $depth < $args['depth'] ) echo
> comment_reply_link(array('add_below' => 'div-comment')) ?>
>
> which would result in the result that Ryan was expecting :)
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:09:12 +1000, Ryan Boren <ryan at boren.nu> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Idled Soul <idledsoul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> After submitting a comment to someone's comment, it was threaded
>>> underneath
>>> their's. That's good obviously! Now, I'm not sure how far the depth of
>>> threaded comments can go though? As I tried submitting a comment
>>> underneath
>>> my own comment to someone else's, the "reply" link is no longer there.
>>> However, the "reply" link is there under original one of mine... Just not
>>> on
>>> the one threaded under it...
>>>
>>> So it's as such:
>>>
>>> Jane's comment (Reply link)
>>> -----My comment under hers. (Reply link)
>>> -------My comment under my own. - no reply link there.
>>>
>>> Would there be allowed for threaded comments, within threaded comments?
>>> Just
>>> was wondering. It's not a big deal actually. I guess it's just expected
>>> that
>>> comments wouldn't or shouldn't be threaded continuously within other
>>> threaded comments. I think I just answered my own question ha ha.
>>
>> wp_list_comments(array('depth' => 0));
>>
>> That will allow unlimited nesting. The default is 3, at the moment.
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>