[wp-testers] advanced screen options

Zhimeng Han hanzhimeng at gmail.com
Fri Nov 28 03:13:53 GMT 2008 

Hi Guys

For screen options function what we get in the screen options dropdown  
are checkboxes with class name "hide-column-tog", what we need is the  
functionality of "hide-postbox-tog".

Cheers

--
Allen Han
hanzhimeng at gmail.com
www.allensplash.com

On 28/11/2008, at 2:27 PM, wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com  
wrote:

> Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
> 	wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	wp-testers-owner at lists.automattic.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Error message spotted.... (Paleo Pat)
>   2. problem with special chars after the upgrade to 2.6.5
>      (Dispoweb2.0[Ghaith])
>   3. Re: Upload Media Broken (Kirk M)
>   4. Re: Screen options function? (Dan Milward)
>   5. Re: Admin font face (Kirk M)
>   6. Re: Admin font face (Paul Robinson)
>   7. Re: Admin font face (Idled Soul)
>   8. Re: Admin font face (Paul Robinson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:49:29 -0500
> From: "Paleo Pat" <tpblogeditor at gmail.com>
> Subject: [wp-testers] Error message spotted....
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
> 	<c3a04f3c0811271449v30033b41ka74e188cea896a58 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> [Thu Nov 27 15:00:40 2008] [error] [client 67.195.37.113] (12)Cannot
> allocate memory: couldn't create child process: /opt/suphp/sbin/suphp
> for /home/k8cpa/public_html/index.php
> [Thu Nov 27 15:00:40 2008] [error] [client 67.195.37.113] (12)Cannot
> allocate memory: couldn't create child process: /opt/suphp/sbin/suphp
> for /home/k8cpa/public_html/index.php
> [Thu Nov 27 15:00:25 2008] [error] [client 71.238.67.152] (12)Cannot
> allocate memory: couldn't create child process: /opt/suphp/sbin/suphp
> for /home/k8cpa/public_html/index.php
> [Thu Nov 27 15:00:25 2008] [error] [client 71.238.67.152] (12)Cannot
> allocate memory: couldn't create child process: /opt/suphp/sbin/suphp
> for /home/k8cpa/public_html/index.php
>
> -----
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> -Paleo Pat
> http://www.politicalbyline.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:52:07 +0100
> From: "Dispoweb2.0[Ghaith]" <dispoweb at gmail.com>
> Subject: [wp-testers] problem with special chars after the upgrade to
> 	2.6.5
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
> 	<131956580811271452t380e6758s60950053c07d9d7f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting a problem after the upgrade I made from 2.6.3 to 2.6.5  
> of my
> wordpress installation, the problem is shown on the blog's feed.
>
> Live demo here : http://www.dispoweb.org/feed  [...] lumières  
> crÃ(c)Ã(c)s avec
> Photoshop [...]
>
> I did the classic steps by disabling the plugins and enable them one  
> by one
> with check with every plugin but no succes to get that work fine.
>
> I dunno if it's caused by the 2.6.5 upgrade or other thing.
>
> The blog is hosted on mediatemple so I think it's not a hoster  
> problem.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ghaith
>
> -- 
> www.dispoweb.org : Stay Web 2.0
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:17:55 -0500
> From: Kirk M <kmb42vt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Upload Media Broken
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <492F38B3.2060107 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> The media uploader in 2.7-beta3-9909 works for me with the exception  
> of
> the progress bar shows up as a wire frame with a bit of "scrunched up"
> text on the left hand side (I'm assuming it says "crunching").  
> Otherwise
> the uploader (Flash) works normally.
>
> On 11/27/2008 1:10 PM, Ben Huson wrote:
>> In the recent updated version 2.7-beta3-9909, the Flash media  
>> uploader
>> is now broken for me.
>> (only tested in Safari - was working fine on yesterdays update)
>>
>> Select a file to upload and nothing appears to happen, no progress  
>> bar etc.
>>
>> If you then click on the gallery tab you find that the file has
>> actually uploaded OK, there was just no progress or success  
>> indicator.
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:21:26 +1100
> From: Dan Milward <dan at instinct.co.nz>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Screen options function?
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <492F3986.3010807 at instinct.co.nz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Thanks Kim but that is not really what we want to do.
>
> Our plugin has its own unique settings page and requires its own  
> option
> boxes... we are not just trying to add an additional box to the post  
> or
> page pages. I wish we were :P
>
> Ciao,
>
> Dan
>
> Kim Parsell wrote:
>> Gentlemen -
>>
>> Try taking a look at the following tutorials and see if any of the
>> information included provides the answers you are looking for:
>>
>> Creating Click & Drag Options Boxes in WP 2.7:
>> http://www.techlyzer.com/2008/11/creating-click-drag-options-boxes-in-wp-27/
>>
>>
>> Add Meta Box:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_meta_box#Example
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Dan Milward wrote:
>>> Yes good question. How does one best take advantage of this new 2.7
>>> functionality :)
>>>
>>> Ciao,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Zhimeng Han wrote:
>>>> Hi, Guys
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to add a screen option box to one of my plugin page,
>>>> what I need to do is hide and show the postboxes, I am using
>>>> function "register_column_headers", that did not do what I  
>>>> expected.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to do this?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Allen Han
>>>> hanzhimeng at gmail.com
>>>> www.allensplash.com
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:24:18 -0500
> From: Kirk M <kmb42vt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Admin font face
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <492F3A32.7030303 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Same here. Thought it actually was Verdana not too long ago. Not a
> change for the better. +1 for Verdana.
>
> On 11/27/2008 3:15 PM, Kim Parsell wrote:
>> Same here. I found an already open ticket
>> (http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/8352) about the font face issue in
>> Ubuntu and added my comments about how the latest font change to
>> Bitstream Vera Sans looks in Windows XP, including a screenshot
>> (http://trac.wordpress.org/attachment/ticket/8352/2.7rev9919-dashboard-windowsXP.png 
>> ).
>>
>>
>> Is this how it looks to any of the rest of you Windows users?
>>
>> It was looking so good when they used Verdana - now I can't hardly
>> read it at all.
>>
>> Definitely a step backwards.
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> --------------------------
>>
>> Debra Scott wrote:
>>> yes very hard on the eyes.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Ade Walker
>>> <photofantaisie at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Is it just me, or is the Bitstream Vera Sans font particularly  
>>>> ugly on
>>>> Windows machines? Personally, I much preferred Verdana which, I
>>>> think I'm
>>>> right in saying, was the font up until a few builds ago. I also  
>>>> find
>>>> that
>>>> Bitsteam is not so easily readable in larger text blocks.
>>>>
>>>> Just my personal opinion - so feel free to ignore me (and no  
>>>> offence
>>>> intended towards those who have put in all the hard work) - but I
>>>> think it
>>>> is a step backwards, design-wise and usability-wise.
>>>>
>>>> Ade.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:52:43 +0000
> From: "Paul Robinson" <pablorobinson at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Admin font face
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
> 	<1931c86d0811271652v3e28a41fvd610f100ebe9ddce at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I haven't upgraded to the latest build yet, but I have seen the font  
> in
> question on my sister's blog, and I wholeheartedly agree with you  
> all. =)
>
> Paul.
>
> 2008/11/28 Kirk M <kmb42vt at gmail.com>
>
>> Same here. Thought it actually was Verdana not too long ago. Not a  
>> change
>> for the better. +1 for Verdana.
>>
>>
>> On 11/27/2008 3:15 PM, Kim Parsell wrote:
>>
>>> Same here. I found an already open ticket (
>>> http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/8352) about the font face issue in
>>> Ubuntu and added my comments about how the latest font change to  
>>> Bitstream
>>> Vera Sans looks in Windows XP, including a screenshot (
>>> http://trac.wordpress.org/attachment/ticket/8352/2.7rev9919-dashboard-windowsXP.png) 
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this how it looks to any of the rest of you Windows users?
>>>
>>> It was looking so good when they used Verdana - now I can't hardly  
>>> read it
>>> at all.
>>>
>>> Definitely a step backwards.
>>>
>>> Kim
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>>
>>> Debra Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes very hard on the eyes.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Ade Walker <photofantaisie at gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it just me, or is the Bitstream Vera Sans font particularly  
>>>>> ugly on
>>>>> Windows machines? Personally, I much preferred Verdana which, I  
>>>>> think
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> right in saying, was the font up until a few builds ago. I also  
>>>>> find
>>>>> that
>>>>> Bitsteam is not so easily readable in larger text blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my personal opinion - so feel free to ignore me (and no  
>>>>> offence
>>>>> intended towards those who have put in all the hard work) - but  
>>>>> I think
>>>>> it
>>>>> is a step backwards, design-wise and usability-wise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ade.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:03:09 -0600
> From: Idled Soul <idledsoul at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Admin font face
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <492F515D.5090502 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> It's "Thanksgiving" people, just be "thankful" for it... Tomorrow we  
> can
> be un-thankful for things like this... :p Lmao... sorry, it must be  
> the
> Pepsi... carry on! carry on!
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:27:03 +0000
> From: "Paul Robinson" <pablorobinson at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Admin font face
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
> 	<1931c86d0811271727j5f9377dkb6a7bd39c3c130fa at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> How did you know I was drinking Pepsi.... *looks around*
>
> Seriously though. That's one damn ugly font. Oh, I'm in the UK  
> anyway we
> don't celebrate thanksgiving. Mwhahaha!
>
> Ahem. Quite.
> Paul.
>
> 2008/11/28 Idled Soul <idledsoul at gmail.com>
>
>> It's "Thanksgiving" people, just be "thankful" for it... Tomorrow  
>> we can be
>> un-thankful for things like this... :p Lmao... sorry, it must be the
>> Pepsi... carry on! carry on!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
>
> End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 118
> *******************************************

More information about the wp-testers mailing list