[wp-testers] WordPress 3.0?

George Pearce iamgspx at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 18:12:20 GMT 2008


I can't see it being a big deal, if I'm honest. Keeping the versioning as it
is will prevent anyone becoming confused, as it has already been announced
to the world as 2.7. Why change it now, so close to it's release date?

George Pearce
http://www.fused.org.uk
iamgspx at gmail.com



2008/11/18 Jeff Chandler <jeffro at jeffro2pt0.com>

> I really don't have an issue with the version number. Seems like many other
> people do.
>
>
> Paleo Pat wrote:
>
>> I offer the one vote of dissent. Let's keep the version numbering as it
>> is,
>> please.
>>
>> That is all.
>>
>> -Pat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Chandler <jeffro at jeffro2pt0.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or not
>>> WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as WordPress 3.0 due in large part
>>> to
>>> the changes that have taken place both on the feature and UI front. I was
>>> wondering if I could get an official word from Ryan Boren or Matt if you
>>> guys intend to keep this as version 2.7 or will you actually brand this
>>> as
>>> 3.0 when it is released? I just want to know the answer when I'm browsing
>>> around the community and I see talk about the version numbers.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-testers mailing list
>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-testers mailing list
>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>


More information about the wp-testers mailing list