[wp-testers] Hanging after "Publish" [Fixed?]

Will Garcia w at will.ph
Tue Dec 2 18:45:59 GMT 2008


Had the same issue with beta2 or something lower.

Here's my list:
http://www.a2b.cc/setloc/bp.a2b
http://api.feedster.com/ping
http://api.my.yahoo.com/RPC2
http://www.blogdigger.com/RPC2
http://www.blogshares.com/rpc.php
http://www.blogsnow.com/ping
http://www.blogstreet.com/xrbin/xmlrpc.cgi
http://coreblog.org/ping/
http://ping.blo.gs/
http://ping.feedburner.com
http://ping.syndic8.com/xmlrpc.php
http://ping.weblogalot.com/rpc.php
http://www.popdex.com/addsite.php
http://rpc.blogrolling.com/pinger/
http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping
http://rpc.weblogs.com/RPC2
http://topicexchange.com/RPC2
http://xping.pubsub.com/ping/
http://api.my.yahoo.com/rss/ping
http://api.moreover.com/ping
http://rpc.icerocket.com:10080/
http://api.my.yahoo.com/rss/ping
http://ping.weblogs.se/
http://blogmatcher.com/u.php
http://coreblog.org/ping/
http://www.blogpeople.net/servlet/weblogUpdates
http://bulkfeeds.net/rpc
http://trackback.bakeinu.jp/bakeping.php
http://ping.myblog.jp
http://ping.bitacoras.com
http://ping.bloggers.jp/rpc/
http://ping.blogmura.jp/rpc/
http://xmlrpc.blogg.de
http://1470.net/api/ping
http://bblog.com/ping.php
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/XMLRPC
http://aggregator.pinoyblogosphere.net/xmlrpc.php
http://rpc.blogcatalog.com/

Opted to remove them but I tried to add some of them again with RC1 and it
works. However, it took longer than normal. Your mileage may vary.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Mark Rodriguez <mrod411 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I had all plugins disabled, except Akismet.
>
> I'm running RC1 & did an automatic upgrade last night & today.
>
> I removed all of the ping services and it worked!  They were located
> in the "writing" settings.
>
> Oddly, they are the same list of services I had been using
> successfully for months in 2.6.5 & earlier.
>
> I use a list I found somewhere:
> http://api.moreover.com/ping
> http://api.my.yahoo.com/rss/ping
> http://blogsearch.google.com/ping/RPC2
> http://ping.bitacoras.com
> http://ping.feedburner.com
> http://ping.syndic8.com/xmlrpc.php
> http://rpc.blogrolling.com/pinger/
> http://rpc.icerocket.com:10080/
> http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping
> http://rpc.weblogs.com/RPC2
> http://topicexchange.com/RPC2
> http://www.blogdigger.com/RPC2
> http://www.blogoole.com/ping/
> http://www.popdex.com/addsite.php
> http://www.wasalive.com/ping/
> http://www.weblogues.com/RPC/
> http://blogping.unidatum.com/RPC2/
>
> Guess one or more may be bad?
>
> Anyone care to share the list they are using & I'll doublecheck.  For
> now, I've removed all ping services.
>
> Thnx Hayes  ;)
>
> --
> Mark Rodriguez
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> Website = http://mrod411.com
> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:54 PM,
> <wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com> wrote:
> > Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
> >        wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >        http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >        wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >        wp-testers-owner at lists.automattic.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Re: Hanging after "Publish" (Mark Rodriguez)
> >   2. Re: Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests (Otto)
> >   3. Re: Re: Hanging after "Publish" (Hayes Potter)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:41:54 -0500
> > From: "Mark Rodriguez" <mrod411 at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [wp-testers] Re: Hanging after "Publish"
> > To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > Message-ID:
> >        <20a9064b0812020941v3476a97gcf7fea4ed8be4008 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > I was hoping you inspired a variable. While my posts weren't large,
> > they did have linked images.  I just did two tests. I created a new
> > post with just text - one word to be exact. It still sat there
> > "Waiting for mrod411.com..." yet posted successfully when I checked in
> > a new Firefox tab.
> >
> > The second test was using the quickpress feature, which worked fine.
> >
> > --
> > Mark Rodriguez
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> > Website = http://mrod411.com
> > RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:26 PM,
> > <wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com> wrote:
> >> Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
> >>        wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>        http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>        wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>        wp-testers-owner at lists.automattic.com
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>   1. Re: How long does the Auto Update take? (Kirk M)
> >>   2. Re[2]: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >>      (Jason Gottschalk)
> >>   3. Re: Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests (g30rg3_x)
> >>   4. Re: How long does the Auto Update take? (Chris Moody)
> >>   5. Hanging after "Publish" (Mark Rodriguez)
> >>   6. Re: Hanging after "Publish" (Paleo Pat)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:34:55 -0500
> >> From: Kirk M <kmb42vt at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Message-ID: <4935397F.4010002 at gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Just as an example:
> >>
> >> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server and
> >> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on how many
> >> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm also
> >> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your plugins
> >> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you running and
> >> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always worth it.
> >>
> >> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>> Hello Chris,
> >>>
> >>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>>
> >>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't write
> wp-trackback.php.
> >>>
> >>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>>
> >>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>>
> >>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or so I
> think.
> >>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:35:12 -0500
> >> From: Jason Gottschalk <Jason at SYO.Com>
> >> Subject: Re[2]: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >> To: Kirk M <wp-testers at lists.automattic.com>
> >> Message-ID: <1537824717.20081202093512 at SYO.Com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
> >>
> >> Hello Kirk,
> >>
> >> "Depending on how many..." I thought this might be it since I had not
> had a successful update in weeks.
> >>
> >> I tried an update this morning, after a successful run last night on the
> third try, but it too failed on the "cannot copy wp-trackback.php" error.
> >>
> >> I have not been dectivating any plugins (I have one)
> >> PHP version is: 5.2.4
> >>
> >>
> >> GET THIS...... :)
> >>
> >> I have determined that I get this error *every other time* I run the
> update:
> >> (and it doesn't seem to matter if I deactivate the plug-ins.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Downloading update from
> http://wordpress.org/nightly-builds/wordpress-latest.zip
> >> Unpacking the core update
> >> Could not copy file:
> /public_html/wp-content/upgrade/core/wordpress/wp-trackback.php
> >> Installation Failed
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 8:34:55 AM, you wrote:
> >> Kirk> Just as an example:
> >>
> >> Kirk> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server
> and
> >> Kirk> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on
> how many
> >> Kirk> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm
> also
> >> Kirk> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your
> plugins
> >> Kirk> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you
> running and
> >> Kirk> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always worth
> it.
> >>
> >> Kirk> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>> Hello Chris,
> >>
> >>>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>
> >>>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't write
> wp-trackback.php.
> >>
> >>>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>
> >>>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>
> >>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or so
> I think.
> >>>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >> Kirk> _______________________________________________
> >> Kirk> wp-testers mailing list
> >> Kirk> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Kirk> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>  Jason Gottschalk                         mailto:Jason at SYO.Com
> >>  SYO Computer Services and Biometric Controls
> >>  586-286-2557
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:41:38 -0600
> >> From: g30rg3_x <g30rg3x at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests
> >> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Message-ID:
> >>        <d5d5430f0812020741q633db467x5ac1eea666b33561 at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>
> >> Well about the Security Requests...
> >>
> >> I have been trying to promote this idea/change since almost 2 years[1]
> >> but even if we change the perspective of the problem this change isn't
> >> going to happen... even that exist a variation of the version
> >> enumeration[2] (introduced in milestone 2.6) that makes every
> >> plugin-based solution totally ineffective (example[3]).
> >>
> >> As for user enumeration on login, well you can still hide that
> >> messages truth the login_errors filter but you can still enumerate
> >> users via /author/<username>, which also can prevented by changing
> >> (directly in the BD) the user_nicename to something different to the
> >> user_login.
> >>
> >> As and example: i have my own personal/private plugin which contains
> >> all this changes (plus one more), you can view it here[4], as you can
> >> see is fairly simple what the plugin does, just as remind about the
> >> version hidden: its changed only inside the admin panel so in order to
> >> fully work you would need to first change the version number on
> >> wp-includes/version.php to something different to real version.
> >>
> >> However i must notice that this modifications won't enhance your
> >> wordpress-based site security, they would make just the exploitation
> >> of _critical_ vulnerability more hard (but just a little), a good
> >> cracker can still be very dangerous even if you hide your version and
> >> other sensitive information, so the best advice is always keep up to
> >> date your WordPress based-site.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> [1] http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4155
> >> [2] http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/7545
> >> [3] http://activeblogging.com/wp-admin/gears-manifest.php
> >> [4] http://paste.ideaslabs.com/show/xgJhcf4a0g
> >>
> >> 2008/12/1 Jacob Santos <wordpress at santosj.name>:
> >>> See reply below previous messages.
> >>>
> >>> Admin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi - I'm sorry I'm a bit late to this list, but I encountered some
> bugs
> >>>> (w/fixes) in the code - hope it's not too late to add them. As well, I
> had
> >>>> some security requests:
> >>>>
> >>>> Bugfix:
> >>>> -------
> >>>> "Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent
> by..."
> >>>>
> >>>> Caused on windows/apache install, when starting with no wp-config.php
> file
> >>>> - auto-creating it adds spaces at end, which gives this message (first
> >>>> visible during the install pages). The fix is to change this line
> >>>> 158@/wp-admin/setup-config.php to add +b for binary:
> >>>>
> >>>> $handle = fopen('../wp-config.php', 'w+b');
> >>>>
> >>>> this prevents the function from defaulting to text format, and
> inserting
> >>>> the extra lines (tested)
> >>>
> >>> I don't think writing text is binary, but okay. It isn't about that, as
> it
> >>> is about the new line character. I've been using the
> >>> wp-admin/setup-config.php and not once has it created an extra newline
> where
> >>> it shouldn't. Would be nice to do it, if it works and fixes the
> problem.
> >>>
> >>>> Security Request:
> >>>> -----------------
> >>>> Remove the generator meta display in themes when called by wp_head(),
> >>>> which is the hook set at line 173@/wp-includes/default-filters.php:
> >>>>
> >>>> add_action('wp_head', 'wp_generator');
> >>>>
> >>>> Although it can be removed in the theme or via plugin (I did a blog
> post
> >>>> at
> >>>>
> http://activeblogging.com/info/wordpress-security-version-numbers-and-themes/
> >>>> explaining how), broadcasting the version by default seems a bad idea
> - an
> >>>> easy way for a spam program to patrol for older installs (or zero day
> >>>> exploits).
> >>>
> >>> Like you said, you can already remove it. That was the reason it was
> added
> >>> as to the filter as opposed to being hard coded. Well, one of the
> reasons.
> >>>
> >>>> Request:
> >>>> --------
> >>>> Add non-indexing code to the login page to keep it out of indexes - it
> >>>> doesn't help search results, and exposes details of the site to casual
> >>>> viewers. To solve, you can insert this around about line
> 48 at wp-login.php:
> >>>>
> >>>> <meta name='robots' content='noindex,nofollow' />
> >>>
> >>> Well, you could probably do this using a plugin as well. Also you can
> add it
> >>> to the robots.txt file for good measure.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Security Request:
> >>>> -----------------
> >>>> While a bit more involved, the security for the login page reveals a
> lot
> >>>> of information - if I enter a correct user name but bad password, it
> tells
> >>>> me; if I enter an invalid user name, it tells me. It might be a good
> idea to
> >>>> replace the specific messages with generic ones - eg "error: incorrect
> >>>> password or invalid username." This makes fishing for information less
> >>>> useful (for example, guessing user names and checking the message to
> see if
> >>>> they exist). The error strings involved all have ">ERROR<" in them, in
> >>>> wp-login.php
> >>>
> >>> This horse as already been beaten to death, risen from the dead and
> then set
> >>> on fire to prevent the zombie from coming back. The reason for it (from
> what
> >>> I can remember from past discussions) are 1) security through obscurity
> >>> usually isn't and 2) It is very helpful when you've forgotten both your
> >>> username and password and don't have immediate or any access to the
> database
> >>> tables.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Misc:
> >>>> -----
> >>>> While fixing the generator metatag issue, I read the documentation at
> >>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/remove_action that:
> >>>>
> >>>> "To remove a hook, the $function_to_remove and $priority arguments
> must
> >>>> match when the hook was added...No warning will be given on removal
> >>>> failure."
> >>>>
> >>>> While not a problem in my case, it means that if later on you change
> the
> >>>> priority of an action added, other code with remove actions will fail
> >>>> silently (unless they are updated to the same priority). This could be
> an
> >>>> unnecessary maintenance issue in the future. Perhaps a function could
> be
> >>>> exposed allowing ALL occurrences of the action function, regardless of
> >>>> priority, to be removed. I'd be happy to submit one if no one has time
> to
> >>>> write it.
> >>>
> >>> It is never going to change. You have no need to worry.
> >>>
> >>> Jacob Santos
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-testers mailing list
> >>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> _________________________
> >>             g30rg3_x
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:46:33 -0800
> >> From: Chris Moody <chris at chrismoody.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Message-ID: <49356669.5060904 at chrismoody.net>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Perhaps its your host? Are you able to upgrade plugins automatically? Or
> >> do you have the same issue?
> >>
> >>
> >> Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>> Hello Kirk,
> >>>
> >>> "Depending on how many..." I thought this might be it since I had not
> had a successful update in weeks.
> >>>
> >>> I tried an update this morning, after a successful run last night on
> the third try, but it too failed on the "cannot copy wp-trackback.php"
> error.
> >>>
> >>> I have not been dectivating any plugins (I have one)
> >>> PHP version is: 5.2.4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> GET THIS...... :)
> >>>
> >>> I have determined that I get this error *every other time* I run the
> update:
> >>> (and it doesn't seem to matter if I deactivate the plug-ins.)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Downloading update from
> http://wordpress.org/nightly-builds/wordpress-latest.zip
> >>> Unpacking the core update
> >>> Could not copy file:
> /public_html/wp-content/upgrade/core/wordpress/wp-trackback.php
> >>> Installation Failed
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 8:34:55 AM, you wrote:
> >>> Kirk> Just as an example:
> >>>
> >>> Kirk> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server
> and
> >>> Kirk> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on
> how many
> >>> Kirk> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm
> also
> >>> Kirk> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your
> plugins
> >>> Kirk> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you
> running and
> >>> Kirk> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always
> worth it.
> >>>
> >>> Kirk> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Hello Chris,
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't write
> wp-trackback.php.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>>>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or so
> I think.
> >>>>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>>>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>>>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> Kirk> _______________________________________________
> >>> Kirk> wp-testers mailing list
> >>> Kirk> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Kirk> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 5
> >> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:06:57 -0500
> >> From: "Mark Rodriguez" <mrod411 at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: [wp-testers] Hanging after "Publish"
> >> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Message-ID:
> >>        <20a9064b0812020906w64c8e1dfx64f91586cba08aec at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Is anyone experiencing hanging after pressing the "publish" button? My
> >> post successfully posts, but I need to navigate away from the edit
> >> page, after hitting publish.
> >>
> >> It started after upgrading to RC1 from 2.6.5.
> >>
> >> I have all plugins disabled, minus the spam catcher.
> >>
> >> I've tried different themes.
> >>
> >> Is this a known issue?  I'm new to this list, so if there is an online
> >> resource for known issues, point the way & I'll follow  :)  Thanks for
> >> the help!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark Rodriguez
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> >> Website = http://mrod411.com
> >> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 6
> >> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:26:18 -0500
> >> From: "Paleo Pat" <tpblogeditor at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Hanging after "Publish"
> >> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> Message-ID:
> >>        <c3a04f3c0812020926u511f7abdl9a85fb7e2926ff3b at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>
> >> Only time it happens with me is when I write a very long posting. I've
> >> mentioned it before. It doesn't happen all the time. So, it's kind of
> >> hard to replicate.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Paleo Pat
> >> http://www.politicalbyline.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Mark Rodriguez <mrod411 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Is anyone experiencing hanging after pressing the "publish" button? My
> >>> post successfully posts, but I need to navigate away from the edit
> >>> page, after hitting publish.
> >>>
> >>> It started after upgrading to RC1 from 2.6.5.
> >>>
> >>> I have all plugins disabled, minus the spam catcher.
> >>>
> >>> I've tried different themes.
> >>>
> >>> Is this a known issue?  I'm new to this list, so if there is an online
> >>> resource for known issues, point the way & I'll follow  :)  Thanks for
> >>> the help!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mark Rodriguez
> >>>
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> >>> Website = http://mrod411.com
> >>> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-testers mailing list
> >>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-testers mailing list
> >> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>
> >>
> >> End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 8
> >> *****************************************
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:35 -0600
> > From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> > Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests
> > To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > Message-ID:
> >        <161617690812020953i45f02d30g79037a24cc14e2a8 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:41 AM, g30rg3_x <g30rg3x at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> However i must notice that this modifications won't enhance your
> >> wordpress-based site security, they would make just the exploitation
> >> of _critical_ vulnerability more hard (but just a little)
> >
> > I can see that this is a topic that just won't die with you, huh? I
> > don't really know how to explain this in a way that will be fully
> > understood here. I've tried before, but it's clearly not getting
> > through. Let me take one final stab at it: Hiding the version number
> > will not make the exploitation of a critical vulnerability harder. Not
> > even a little bit. Really.
> >
> > Look at it from the point of view of an attacker. There's two possible
> > scenarios to consider:
> >
> >
> > Scenario 1: Cracker wants to exploit a lot of sites and stick his spam
> > on them. This is the most common case.
> >
> > In this scenario, the cracker gets a big list of vulnerabilities, and
> > spams them across every site he can find. When one of them strikes
> > paydirt, the "load" is injected, which then goes and cracks every
> > piece of software on that server possible. You see this a lot on
> > shared hosting setups, once the exploit is performed, a script is
> > loaded which searches all possible injection points on that server and
> > writes his spam into everywhere it can find to do so. This infects
> > many more sites on that server with the link spam, and causes
> > potentially hundreds of sites to now have links back to the spammer's
> > stuff.
> >
> > This is a common case because it's an easy one. Software exists to do
> > exactly this sort of thing. Vulnerabilites are circulated in
> > plug-and-play forms for these specific types of software.
> > Exploits/injections are pluggable as well, and can be easily adapted
> > to any spam you want to use. In literally a matter of minutes, with
> > zero code being written by the attacker, somebody can create a system
> > using nothing but plug and play modules that will attempt to exploit
> > hundreds of known vulnerabilities on a list of millions of websites,
> > and it can even run on a distributed system (botnet). All it requires
> > is money and a lack of morals.
> >
> > Note that NONE of this involves ever caring what version of the
> > WordPress software you are running. Indeed, they don't even care that
> > you are running WordPress. It's simply one of the many different
> > packages with exploits coded into their exploit-pack. Indeed, checking
> > your version before attempting to exploit you doesn't really save them
> > anything. Time, perhaps, but only slightly, and only if the software
> > is smart enough to care (95% of these softwares are not, they just
> > spam a series of hacks and check for success/failure).
> >
> >
> > Scenario 2: Somebody with a revenge fixation decides they want to hack
> > you, specifically.
> >
> > In this scenario, they can quickly tell that you're running WordPress.
> > a) Assuming you're not hiding your version, then they look for
> > exploits for that version.
> > b) Assuming you're running the latest version, then they won't find
> > any and you're safe.
> > c) Assuming they're slightly smarter than that, they do some
> > easy-to-do searches, find exploitable software running on other
> > websites, but on the same shared host as you, and hack you that way.
> > d) Failing all this, they stamp their feet and give up.
> >
> > Now, in your situation, you want to hide the version of WordPress.
> > This stops them from looking for specific exploits. However, a list of
> > generic WordPress exploits for several versions *is just as good to
> > them*. They can sit there and try half a dozen exploits, no problem.
> > It doesn't take them any more time, really. Just a few extra HTTP
> > requests. If they don't know how to do this sort of thing themselves,
> > then they download a bunch of script kiddie hacks and run them all,
> > hoping that one hits. The point being that they are not significantly
> > slowed by this sort of preventative medicine. And anyway, assuming
> > you're running the latest version and therefore "safe", it makes no
> > difference anyway.
> >
> >
> > Now, you might be considering scenario 3: Zero-day exploits. An
> > exploit is discovered against the latest version, so there is a
> > limited amount of time to exploit it before it is patched. Having your
> > version hidden means you don't show up in searched for that version.
> > Problem with that sort of thinking is that they're not searching for
> > sites with a specific version. They just keep a single list of known
> > websites for that sort of thing. When a zero-day is discovered, they
> > spam it across to all of them. *Searching takes too much time*. It's
> > easier to simply keep a list of a whole crapload of sites, then spam
> > them all. And version checking is not done here either, because it's
> > faster to attempt the hack than it is to a) check for vulnerability
> > and then b) attempt the hack. Trying the hack takes the same time as
> > checking for the version number, so why bother? Makes no sense.
> >
> >
> > Hiding the version is simply ineffective, in all respects. It does
> > nothing that is even slightly helpful for your site. It deters nobody.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:53:25 -0500
> > From: Hayes Potter <hayes at redtiedesigns.com>
> > Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: Hanging after "Publish"
> > To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > Message-ID: <49357615.1020100 at redtiedesigns.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Mark Rodriguez wrote:
> >> I was hoping you inspired a variable. While my posts weren't large,
> >> they did have linked images.  I just did two tests. I created a new
> >> post with just text - one word to be exact. It still sat there
> >> "Waiting for mrod411.com..." yet posted successfully when I checked in
> >> a new Firefox tab.
> >>
> >> The second test was using the quickpress feature, which worked fine.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark Rodriguez
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> >> Website = http://mrod411.com
> >> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:26 PM,
> >> <wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
> >>>        wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>
> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>        http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>>        wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com
> >>>
> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>>        wp-testers-owner at lists.automattic.com
> >>>
> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>> than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Today's Topics:
> >>>
> >>>   1. Re: How long does the Auto Update take? (Kirk M)
> >>>   2. Re[2]: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >>>      (Jason Gottschalk)
> >>>   3. Re: Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests (g30rg3_x)
> >>>   4. Re: How long does the Auto Update take? (Chris Moody)
> >>>   5. Hanging after "Publish" (Mark Rodriguez)
> >>>   6. Re: Hanging after "Publish" (Paleo Pat)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 1
> >>> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:34:55 -0500
> >>> From: Kirk M <kmb42vt at gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >>> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Message-ID: <4935397F.4010002 at gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
> >>>
> >>> Just as an example:
> >>>
> >>> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server and
> >>> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on how
> many
> >>> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm also
> >>> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your plugins
> >>> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you running
> and
> >>> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always worth it.
> >>>
> >>> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello Chris,
> >>>>
> >>>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't write
> wp-trackback.php.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>>>
> >>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or so
> I think.
> >>>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 2
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:35:12 -0500
> >>> From: Jason Gottschalk <Jason at SYO.Com>
> >>> Subject: Re[2]: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >>> To: Kirk M <wp-testers at lists.automattic.com>
> >>> Message-ID: <1537824717.20081202093512 at SYO.Com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
> >>>
> >>> Hello Kirk,
> >>>
> >>> "Depending on how many..." I thought this might be it since I had not
> had a successful update in weeks.
> >>>
> >>> I tried an update this morning, after a successful run last night on
> the third try, but it too failed on the "cannot copy wp-trackback.php"
> error.
> >>>
> >>> I have not been dectivating any plugins (I have one)
> >>> PHP version is: 5.2.4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> GET THIS...... :)
> >>>
> >>> I have determined that I get this error *every other time* I run the
> update:
> >>> (and it doesn't seem to matter if I deactivate the plug-ins.)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Downloading update from
> http://wordpress.org/nightly-builds/wordpress-latest.zip
> >>> Unpacking the core update
> >>> Could not copy file:
> /public_html/wp-content/upgrade/core/wordpress/wp-trackback.php
> >>> Installation Failed
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 8:34:55 AM, you wrote:
> >>> Kirk> Just as an example:
> >>>
> >>> Kirk> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server
> and
> >>> Kirk> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on
> how many
> >>> Kirk> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm
> also
> >>> Kirk> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your
> plugins
> >>> Kirk> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you
> running and
> >>> Kirk> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always
> worth it.
> >>>
> >>> Kirk> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Hello Chris,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't write
> wp-trackback.php.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>>>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or so
> I think.
> >>>>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>>>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>>>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> Kirk> _______________________________________________
> >>> Kirk> wp-testers mailing list
> >>> Kirk> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Kirk> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>  Jason Gottschalk                         mailto:Jason at SYO.Com
> >>>  SYO Computer Services and Biometric Controls
> >>>  586-286-2557
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 3
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:41:38 -0600
> >>> From: g30rg3_x <g30rg3x at gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: Bugs/Fixes, Security Requests
> >>> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>        <d5d5430f0812020741q633db467x5ac1eea666b33561 at mail.gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>>
> >>> Well about the Security Requests...
> >>>
> >>> I have been trying to promote this idea/change since almost 2 years[1]
> >>> but even if we change the perspective of the problem this change isn't
> >>> going to happen... even that exist a variation of the version
> >>> enumeration[2] (introduced in milestone 2.6) that makes every
> >>> plugin-based solution totally ineffective (example[3]).
> >>>
> >>> As for user enumeration on login, well you can still hide that
> >>> messages truth the login_errors filter but you can still enumerate
> >>> users via /author/<username>, which also can prevented by changing
> >>> (directly in the BD) the user_nicename to something different to the
> >>> user_login.
> >>>
> >>> As and example: i have my own personal/private plugin which contains
> >>> all this changes (plus one more), you can view it here[4], as you can
> >>> see is fairly simple what the plugin does, just as remind about the
> >>> version hidden: its changed only inside the admin panel so in order to
> >>> fully work you would need to first change the version number on
> >>> wp-includes/version.php to something different to real version.
> >>>
> >>> However i must notice that this modifications won't enhance your
> >>> wordpress-based site security, they would make just the exploitation
> >>> of _critical_ vulnerability more hard (but just a little), a good
> >>> cracker can still be very dangerous even if you hide your version and
> >>> other sensitive information, so the best advice is always keep up to
> >>> date your WordPress based-site.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4155
> >>> [2] http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/7545
> >>> [3] http://activeblogging.com/wp-admin/gears-manifest.php
> >>> [4] http://paste.ideaslabs.com/show/xgJhcf4a0g
> >>>
> >>> 2008/12/1 Jacob Santos <wordpress at santosj.name>:
> >>>
> >>>> See reply below previous messages.
> >>>>
> >>>> Admin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi - I'm sorry I'm a bit late to this list, but I encountered some
> bugs
> >>>>> (w/fixes) in the code - hope it's not too late to add them. As well,
> I had
> >>>>> some security requests:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bugfix:
> >>>>> -------
> >>>>> "Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent
> by..."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Caused on windows/apache install, when starting with no wp-config.php
> file
> >>>>> - auto-creating it adds spaces at end, which gives this message
> (first
> >>>>> visible during the install pages). The fix is to change this line
> >>>>> 158@/wp-admin/setup-config.php to add +b for binary:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> $handle = fopen('../wp-config.php', 'w+b');
> >>>>>
> >>>>> this prevents the function from defaulting to text format, and
> inserting
> >>>>> the extra lines (tested)
> >>>>>
> >>>> I don't think writing text is binary, but okay. It isn't about that,
> as it
> >>>> is about the new line character. I've been using the
> >>>> wp-admin/setup-config.php and not once has it created an extra newline
> where
> >>>> it shouldn't. Would be nice to do it, if it works and fixes the
> problem.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Security Request:
> >>>>> -----------------
> >>>>> Remove the generator meta display in themes when called by wp_head(),
> >>>>> which is the hook set at line 173@/wp-includes/default-filters.php:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> add_action('wp_head', 'wp_generator');
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Although it can be removed in the theme or via plugin (I did a blog
> post
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>
> http://activeblogging.com/info/wordpress-security-version-numbers-and-themes/
> >>>>> explaining how), broadcasting the version by default seems a bad idea
> - an
> >>>>> easy way for a spam program to patrol for older installs (or zero day
> >>>>> exploits).
> >>>>>
> >>>> Like you said, you can already remove it. That was the reason it was
> added
> >>>> as to the filter as opposed to being hard coded. Well, one of the
> reasons.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Request:
> >>>>> --------
> >>>>> Add non-indexing code to the login page to keep it out of indexes -
> it
> >>>>> doesn't help search results, and exposes details of the site to
> casual
> >>>>> viewers. To solve, you can insert this around about line
> 48 at wp-login.php:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <meta name='robots' content='noindex,nofollow' />
> >>>>>
> >>>> Well, you could probably do this using a plugin as well. Also you can
> add it
> >>>> to the robots.txt file for good measure.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Security Request:
> >>>>> -----------------
> >>>>> While a bit more involved, the security for the login page reveals a
> lot
> >>>>> of information - if I enter a correct user name but bad password, it
> tells
> >>>>> me; if I enter an invalid user name, it tells me. It might be a good
> idea to
> >>>>> replace the specific messages with generic ones - eg "error:
> incorrect
> >>>>> password or invalid username." This makes fishing for information
> less
> >>>>> useful (for example, guessing user names and checking the message to
> see if
> >>>>> they exist). The error strings involved all have ">ERROR<" in them,
> in
> >>>>> wp-login.php
> >>>>>
> >>>> This horse as already been beaten to death, risen from the dead and
> then set
> >>>> on fire to prevent the zombie from coming back. The reason for it
> (from what
> >>>> I can remember from past discussions) are 1) security through
> obscurity
> >>>> usually isn't and 2) It is very helpful when you've forgotten both
> your
> >>>> username and password and don't have immediate or any access to the
> database
> >>>> tables.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Misc:
> >>>>> -----
> >>>>> While fixing the generator metatag issue, I read the documentation at
> >>>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/remove_action that:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "To remove a hook, the $function_to_remove and $priority arguments
> must
> >>>>> match when the hook was added...No warning will be given on removal
> >>>>> failure."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While not a problem in my case, it means that if later on you change
> the
> >>>>> priority of an action added, other code with remove actions will fail
> >>>>> silently (unless they are updated to the same priority). This could
> be an
> >>>>> unnecessary maintenance issue in the future. Perhaps a function could
> be
> >>>>> exposed allowing ALL occurrences of the action function, regardless
> of
> >>>>> priority, to be removed. I'd be happy to submit one if no one has
> time to
> >>>>> write it.
> >>>>>
> >>>> It is never going to change. You have no need to worry.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacob Santos
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> wp-testers mailing list
> >>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> _________________________
> >>>             g30rg3_x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 4
> >>> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:46:33 -0800
> >>> From: Chris Moody <chris at chrismoody.net>
> >>> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] How long does the Auto Update take?
> >>> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Message-ID: <49356669.5060904 at chrismoody.net>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps its your host? Are you able to upgrade plugins automatically?
> Or
> >>> do you have the same issue?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello Kirk,
> >>>>
> >>>> "Depending on how many..." I thought this might be it since I had not
> had a successful update in weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried an update this morning, after a successful run last night on
> the third try, but it too failed on the "cannot copy wp-trackback.php"
> error.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not been dectivating any plugins (I have one)
> >>>> PHP version is: 5.2.4
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> GET THIS...... :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I have determined that I get this error *every other time* I run the
> update:
> >>>> (and it doesn't seem to matter if I deactivate the plug-ins.)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Downloading update from
> http://wordpress.org/nightly-builds/wordpress-latest.zip
> >>>> Unpacking the core update
> >>>> Could not copy file:
> /public_html/wp-content/upgrade/core/wordpress/wp-trackback.php
> >>>> Installation Failed
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 8:34:55 AM, you wrote:
> >>>> Kirk> Just as an example:
> >>>>
> >>>> Kirk> I have low end DSL (128k up/768k down), a Bluehost shared server
> and
> >>>> Kirk> auto update takes anywhere between 5 to 10 seconds depending on
> how many
> >>>> Kirk> files have changed and the load on the server at the time. I'm
> also
> >>>> Kirk> running PHP 5.2.6 (fastCGI). And are you deactivating all your
> plugins
> >>>> Kirk> before you attempt an update? Also, what PHP version are you
> running and
> >>>> Kirk> your connection speed? I know, stupid checks but it's always
> worth it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kirk> On 12/2/2008 1:07 AM, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Hello Chris,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> 20 minutes on the first try tonight, I gave up.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Went back and it ran 25 minutes then gave an error, it couldn't
> write wp-trackback.php.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Tried a third time (no changes) and it finished in 30 minutes,
> successfully.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Phew..... I was getting nervous!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 12:50:28 AM, you wrote:
> >>>>>> Chris>  Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello Wp-testers,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Auto update is taking forever for me. I cannot tell what it is
> doing, seems like it is not doing anything.  I usually give up and move on.
> I can't tell if actually updates anything or not.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Chris>  It has been telling me its completed in about 2 minutes or
> so I think.
> >>>>>> Chris>  Maybe faster...
> >>>>>> Chris>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Chris>  wp-testers mailing list
> >>>>>> Chris>  wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>> Chris>  http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> Kirk> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Kirk> wp-testers mailing list
> >>>> Kirk> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> Kirk> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 5
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:06:57 -0500
> >>> From: "Mark Rodriguez" <mrod411 at gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: [wp-testers] Hanging after "Publish"
> >>> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>        <20a9064b0812020906w64c8e1dfx64f91586cba08aec at mail.gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>>
> >>> Is anyone experiencing hanging after pressing the "publish" button? My
> >>> post successfully posts, but I need to navigate away from the edit
> >>> page, after hitting publish.
> >>>
> >>> It started after upgrading to RC1 from 2.6.5.
> >>>
> >>> I have all plugins disabled, minus the spam catcher.
> >>>
> >>> I've tried different themes.
> >>>
> >>> Is this a known issue?  I'm new to this list, so if there is an online
> >>> resource for known issues, point the way & I'll follow  :)  Thanks for
> >>> the help!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mark Rodriguez
> >>>
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> >>> Website = http://mrod411.com
> >>> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 6
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:26:18 -0500
> >>> From: "Paleo Pat" <tpblogeditor at gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Hanging after "Publish"
> >>> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>>        <c3a04f3c0812020926u511f7abdl9a85fb7e2926ff3b at mail.gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>>
> >>> Only time it happens with me is when I write a very long posting. I've
> >>> mentioned it before. It doesn't happen all the time. So, it's kind of
> >>> hard to replicate.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Paleo Pat
> >>> http://www.politicalbyline.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Mark Rodriguez <mrod411 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is anyone experiencing hanging after pressing the "publish" button? My
> >>>> post successfully posts, but I need to navigate away from the edit
> >>>> page, after hitting publish.
> >>>>
> >>>> It started after upgrading to RC1 from 2.6.5.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have all plugins disabled, minus the spam catcher.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've tried different themes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this a known issue?  I'm new to this list, so if there is an online
> >>>> resource for known issues, point the way & I'll follow  :)  Thanks for
> >>>> the help!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mark Rodriguez
> >>>>
> >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> E-mail = mrod411 at gmail.com
> >>>> Website = http://mrod411.com
> >>>> RSS = http://friendfeed.com/mrod411?format=atom
> >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> wp-testers mailing list
> >>>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-testers mailing list
> >>> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 8
> >>> *****************************************
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-testers mailing list
> >> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >>
> >>
> > Some plugins, like "WP-Super-Cache" have an option to clear the cache
> > after every published post, this slows posting drastically.
> >
> > Another option that can slow posting is, having too much ping services
> > set, which is in your setting tabs under "Writing"...err maybe "Reading"
> > I forget.
> >
> > Oh, and what version of wordpress?
> >
> > Tell me if it works or not, if not I'll try something else.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
> >
> > End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 9
> > *****************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>



-- 
Will Garcia
http://will.ph/


More information about the wp-testers mailing list