[wp-testers] Re: wp-testers Digest, Vol 32, Issue 11

[Tabrez Iqbal]

I received previous two wp-tester email digests in my spam box; I marked it
as non-spam and got this one in the inbox.

Why sudden hate for this mailing list by the spam-markers?

Tabrez
-- 
http://beans.seartipy.com/
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking." -- Dr.
Gregory House(House MD)

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:17:39 -0400
> From: spencerp <spencerp1 at gmail.com>
>
Just an FYI, I had about 21 WP List emails found in the GMAIL spam bin.
> Ones from testers and hackers... Not sure how they got there, but others
> might want to check their spam bins too..
>
> --
> spencerp
> http://spencerp.net
> http://www.vindictivebastard.net
>
>
> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:27:19 -0700
> From: Matt <speedboxer at gmail.com>
>
> On 10/7/07, spencerp <spencerp1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just an FYI, I had about 21 WP List emails found in the GMAIL spam bin.
> > Ones from testers and hackers... Not sure how they got there, but others
> > might want to check their spam bins too..
> >
> I've also been seeing wp-hackers and wp-testers emails being marked as
> SPAM... Could it be all the quoting that tends to be in these mailing list
> threads? Ironically, your message was marked as SPAM also. :P
>
>
> --
> Matt (speedboxer at gmail.com)
> http://mattsblog.ca/
>
> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:35:28 +1000
> From: Jeremy Visser <jeremy.visser at gmail.com>
>
> Matt wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, spencerp <spencerp1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Just an FYI, I had about 21 WP List emails found in the GMAIL spam bin.
> >> Ones from testers and hackers... Not sure how they got there, but
> others
> >> might want to check their spam bins too..
> >>
> > I've also been seeing wp-hackers and wp-testers emails being marked as
> > SPAM... Could it be all the quoting that tends to be in these mailing
> list
> > threads? Ironically, your message was marked as SPAM also. :P
>
> Me too. Plus, I've been getting a whole lot of spam in my inbox in the
> last few days as well.
>
>
>