[wp-testers] Re: 2.0.10 and 2.1.3 Release Candidates

[spencerp]

Ryan Boren wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Gene Steinberg <gene at macnightowl.com> wrote:
>> On 3/16/07 3:53 PM, "Tom Mount" <tmountjr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Not that this is a big deal, but it looks like
>> > /wp-includes/version.php wasn't updated to reflect the new build
>> > number and RC status - I copied over all the new files from the latest
>> > release and it still shows RC1.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I noticed that as well. I suppose if it's a big deal, one can 
>> change it
>> manually.
>>
>> Unless the "REAL" 2.1.3 is due out in a few days, of course.
>
> Doh.  I suck.  Sorry about that.  Let's just pretend it says RC2 so
> that I don't have to make an RC3.  :-)
>
> Ryan

To be honest though, when I was running 2.1-alphaX's during it's stages 
before it was officially released. I usually just manually changed the 
version itself anyway after I downloaded the SVN updated files to 
computer. So for example: 2.1-alpha1 became: 2.1..... 2.1-alpha2 was 
just changed to: 2.1 ..... Of course I just left the rev number alone 
though.. IMHO, it's really no big deal per se..

--
spencerp
http://spencerp.net