[wp-testers] Re: wp-testers Digest, Vol 23, Issue 46

Ashish Mohta ashish.mohta at gmail.com
Wed Jan 24 13:52:03 GMT 2007 

Hi

I am unable to put you tube code in wordpress.2.1 It doesnt show up when
seen in view mode..

What can be done?

Ashish


On 1/24/07, wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com <
wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com> wrote:
>
> Send wp-testers mailing list submissions to
>         wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wp-testers-request at lists.automattic.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wp-testers-owner at lists.automattic.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of wp-testers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. re: 2.1 RC2 & Compat Plugins (S G)
>    2. RE: Here's one I hadn't seen before. (Brian Layman)
>    3. Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1? (Brian Layman)
>    4. Re: WP-login form actions (Matt)
>    5. Re: Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1? (Dov MD)
>    6. Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Dov MD)
>    7. Re: Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Aaron Brazell)
>    8. Re: Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade! (Dov MD)
>    9. Re: WP-login form actions (Robin Adrianse)
>   10. Degrade procedure? (Dov MD)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:16:50 +0000 (GMT)
> From: S G <der_aufzynd at yahoo.de>
> Subject: [wp-testers] re: 2.1 RC2 & Compat Plugins
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <20070123131650.24057.qmail at web28004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hello,
>
> my plugin readers_post also works with WP2.1
> The URL is http://www.aufzynden.de/post-readers-wp-plugin/
>
> Best regards
> Stefan
>
> ... die besonderen Seiten des Motorradfahrens ...
> http://www.aufzynden.de
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:18:53 -0500
> From: "Brian Layman" <Brian at TheCodeCave.com>
> Subject: RE: [wp-testers] Here's one I hadn't seen before.
> To: <wp-testers at lists.automattic.com>
> Message-ID:
>         <D0252C90757CBC4B8BC938A72BEDDF9D021E6BC6 at dsimail.drbsystems.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> >Not worth the bulk of code needed to add backwards compat.
>
> I would agree.  I had to laugh at myself, because I thought the system had
> done a one click spam deletion with no prompting.  I thought "No, that
> couldn't have gotten through..."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brian Layman
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:45:42 -0500
> From: "Brian Layman" <Brian at TheCodeCave.com>
> Subject: [wp-testers] Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1?
> To: <wp-testers at lists.automattic.com>
> Message-ID:
>         <D0252C90757CBC4B8BC938A72BEDDF9D021E6BD1 at dsimail.drbsystems.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Is anyone else being slammed with spam today?  I'm getting loads of them
> and
> I have at least 10 spams get through Akismet.  I've had the occasional
> spam
> get through before, but never 10 in just half a day...  I'm willing to
> believe it is just one spammer using a method Akismet hasn't known, but
> this
> coincidence is awfully close to the 2.1 upgrade...
> _______________________________________________
> Brian Layman
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com
> http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:44:08 -0800
> From: Matt <speedboxer at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WP-login form actions
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <b88434820701231044p54d02709q997093a082e3ae12 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> This seems like a good idea. Also, if you had a SSL certificate installed
> on
> another domain (such as using a shared certificate that a lot of hosts
> give
> you access to) you'd be able to put wp-login.php on that other SSL domain.
>
>
> On 1/22/07, Sean Hayford O'Leary <sdho at sdho.org> wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking about this situation. Say you have your WP install at
> > http://site.com but have SSL and wish to encrypt your password when
> > you log in (for good reason). So you set the WordPress address to
> > httpS://site.com and log in at httpS://site.com/wp-login.php.
> >
> > This works fine. BUT if you log in at http://site.com/wp-login.php
> > (which is not exactly unlikely -- many users append "wp-login.php"
> > when visiting their blog) it won't send the information to
> > httpS://site.com/wp-login.php, it'll send it to
> > http://site.com/wp-login.php. Sorry for the capital Ss, didn't want
> > any confusion. Of course it's not just SSL -- any time you have that
> > same file accessible from more than one address, problems arise.
> >
> > So, would there be any problem with using the wpurl setting when
> > sending the form? Like on line 344, instead of:
> >
> > <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="wp-login.php"
> method="post">
> >
> > we had
> >
> > <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="<?php
> > bloginfo('wpurl'); ?>/wp-login.php" method="post">
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > --
> > Sean Hayford O'Leary
> > http://sdho.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt (speedboxer at gmail.com)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:49:00 -0400
> From: "Dov MD" <dovmd1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Is Akismet functioning well in 2.1?
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <f783ef800701231049t1cf12f3r817e53ca168e6d71 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Sometimes comes more than the usual but it doesn't have any connection
> with
> any of the upgrades i have donde before... May it's a coincidence man!
>
> At least everything if fine over here...
>
> On 1/23/07, Brian Layman <Brian at thecodecave.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone else being slammed with spam today?  I'm getting loads of them
> > and
> > I have at least 10 spams get through Akismet.  I've had the occasional
> > spam
> > get through before, but never 10 in just half a day...  I'm willing to
> > believe it is just one spammer using a method Akismet hasn't known, but
> > this
> > coincidence is awfully close to the 2.1 upgrade...
> > _______________________________________________
> > Brian Layman
> > http://www.TheCodeCave.com
> > http://www.TheCodeCave.com/EasyWPUpgrade
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:51:13 -0400
> From: "Dov MD" <dovmd1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <f783ef800701231051jf13e63eu2e823f32eff949d0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi!
> Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
> 2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
> completely!
> I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks to be
> ok...
> Any ideas?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:53:27 -0500
> From: Aaron Brazell <abrazell at b5media.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID: <ECDB47A1-A637-42C7-BA27-5325DB3B3CD4 at b5media.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Out of curiosity, is your template using wp_list_bookmarks()?
> --
> Aaron Brazell
> Technology Architect, b5media
> "A Global New Media Company"
>
> web:: www.b5media.com, www.technosailor.com
> phone:: 410-608-6620
> skype:: technosailor
>
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Dov MD wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
> > 2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
> > completely!
> > I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks
> > to be
> > ok...
> > Any ideas?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:00:41 -0400
> From: "Dov MD" <dovmd1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Blogroll dissappear after 2.1 Upgrade!
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <f783ef800701231100n3fa1a5a8qfc434843cf190d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> This the the part of the code refering to:
>
> <?php wp_get_links(1); ?>
>
> There is a <?php wp_get_links(2); ?> & <?php wp_get_links(3); ?> that are
> working properly. I cannot figure what's going on here...
>
> On 1/23/07, Aaron Brazell <abrazell at b5media.com> wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, is your template using wp_list_bookmarks()?
> > --
> > Aaron Brazell
> > Technology Architect, b5media
> > "A Global New Media Company"
> >
> > web:: www.b5media.com, www.technosailor.com
> > phone:: 410-608-6620
> > skype:: technosailor
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Dov MD wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > > Have someone over there any trouble with blogroll list after the
> > > 2.1upgrade? In one of my domains ths blogroll list has gone
> > > completely!
> > > I was thinking in the template, but i checked and everything looks
> > > to be
> > > ok...
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:37:41 -0800
> From: "Robin Adrianse" <shorty114 at shorty114.net>
> Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WP-login form actions
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <d135ca9c0701231037j2992926ey3f731a4b4b743f34 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I think this is a good idea -- feel free to submit it to the Trac (
> trac.wordpress.org).
>
> On 1/22/07, Sean Hayford O'Leary <sdho at sdho.org> wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking about this situation. Say you have your WP install at
> > http://site.com but have SSL and wish to encrypt your password when
> > you log in (for good reason). So you set the WordPress address to
> > httpS://site.com and log in at httpS://site.com/wp-login.php.
> >
> > This works fine. BUT if you log in at http://site.com/wp-login.php
> > (which is not exactly unlikely -- many users append "wp-login.php"
> > when visiting their blog) it won't send the information to
> > httpS://site.com/wp-login.php, it'll send it to
> > http://site.com/wp-login.php. Sorry for the capital Ss, didn't want
> > any confusion. Of course it's not just SSL -- any time you have that
> > same file accessible from more than one address, problems arise.
> >
> > So, would there be any problem with using the wpurl setting when
> > sending the form? Like on line 344, instead of:
> >
> >   <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="wp-login.php"
> > method="post">
> >
> > we had
> >
> >   <form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="<?php
> > bloginfo('wpurl'); ?>/wp-login.php" method="post">
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > --
> > Sean Hayford O'Leary
> > http://sdho.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:05:27 -0400
> From: "Dov MD" <dovmd1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [wp-testers] Degrade procedure?
> To: wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> Message-ID:
>         <f783ef800701231105x501ac2ffm6f17b1b1567f25e6 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Can someone tell what would be the "degrade" procedure after a 2.1 upgrade
> ?
>
> TY
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
>
> End of wp-testers Digest, Vol 23, Issue 46
> ******************************************
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards
Ashish

Tech Blog : http://www.technospot.net/blogs/
Blogg-Buzz:http://www.blogg-buzz.com

More information about the wp-testers mailing list