[wp-testers] wp-includes/cache ??

[Mike Kelly]

I agree with Podz, as someone already said, the speed difference is
minimal.  I think it's a cool feature, and can be handy, but should be left
off by default.  It could be an option in the options panel of the acp
though, and in there a warning that it's relatively advanced and you must
give write permissions to the directory.

On 11/23/05, Podz <podz at tamba2.org.uk> wrote:
>
> David House wrote:
> > On 23/11/05, Podz <podz at tamba2.org.uk> wrote:
> >> Cue support forum questions .... can we have something in admin about
> >> this please ?
> >
> > Most of the time this shouldn't be a problem. As the folder is created
> > by WordPress itself it should have the right permissions. I think a
> > codex page should suffice.
>
> We dop get questions about the behaviour of wp on install in that it
> creates a new theme based on the name - something i still fail to
> understand, but whatever - so testing this on many platforms would be
> very very useful.
>
> On a regular blog, of how much value is this cache behaviour ? At what
> level of hits does it become something postively useful as opposed to
> something bolted on ?
>
> P.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-testers/attachments/20051123/0537eea9/attachment.htm