[wp-testers] TinyMCE Shows up Only Partially

[Roy Schestowitz]

_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 06:51:58 GMT, [Andy Skelton] wrote : \_____

> On 12/6/05, Roy Schestowitz <wp-lowtraffic at schestowitz.com> wrote:
>>   * wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/code.gif
>>
>>   in the above, notice the word "advanced" which vaguely resembles
>>   "advertisement". If you change the path to, let us say:
>>
>>   wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/pro/
>>
>> The issue would be resolved altogether.
>
> Maybe so, but this sounds very hypothetical.
>
> I'm not excited about changing the directory structure to accommodate
> an optional browser extension that is too liberal in its filtering of
> page elements. Is that the default behavior of the extension? How hard
> is it to fix the extension?
>
> WP isn't broken in this situation, you have willfully broken your
> browser. If you want to submit a patch for WP to accommodate you, log
> into trac with your wp.org credentials and do so.

_____/ On Tue 06 Dec 2005 06:58:41 GMT, [Andy Skelton] wrote : \_____

>> From looking at Roy's CSS attachment, img[src*="/adv"] is probably the
> selector that is causing your browser to ignore the icons.

Hi Andy,

I  am not suggesting a patch that accommodates my individual needs. I  did
not  add the img[src*="/adv"] selector myself. The Mozilla Foundation (now
Corporation?)  encourages people to use that cascading style sheet if they
wish  to block advertisements. You can expect a decent number of people to
willfully  put this extension in place. The exclusion is there by  default
and can be applied to any version of Firefox.

I  fully understand your side. That's exactly why (earlier in this  corre-
spondence)  I alluded to the fact that it would be ridiculous to bend  for
the  sake of some obscure extension. All I say is that it may cause  trou-
ble.

Cheers,

Roy