[wp-hackers] XCache Variable Storage vs. WP Object Cache

[DD32]

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:31:09 +1000, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
> Only thing I can think of is this warning on the XCache site:
> Warning : At the moment, It is not possible to store resources,
> callbacks or objects using xcache_* functions.
>
>
> Does WP Object Cache attempt to cache any of these? If so, is there
> any way of stopping it from doing so?

Theres quite a few Objects being stored in the Object Cache :)
I dont think any Resources are attempted for caching, and i'd be unsure about callbacks.

using serialize() should convert everything into a string for storing though.

> Thanks.
>
> On 9/16/07, Stephane Daury <wordpress at tekartist.org> wrote:
>>
>> /me loooove memcache
>>
>> But I wish php/memcache would allow for:
>> - regex for keymapping
>> - tag keys like done in the Zend Framework
>>
>> Stephane
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2007, at 3:32, Tom Barta wrote:
>>
>> >> But it is almost always going to be faster to use a memory-based
>> >> object storage engine than the built-in file-based method, as
>> >> retrieving data from memory is orders of magnitude faster than
>> >> retrieving data from a hard disk.
>> >
>> > I don't have any hard numbers at the moment, but I was playing with
>> > memcache at one point and discovered something surprising (and
>> > disheartening about PHP);  Caching arbitrary objects with memcache
>> > (within a single request) was faster than using a PHP associative
>> > array as a cache!  Memcache is wicked fast.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tom
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wp-hackers mailing list
>> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>
>