[wp-hackers] Validating Atom 1.0 feed
CaptainN at unFocus.com
Thu Feb 1 19:20:43 GMT 2007
Ah, I wondered if that might be the case :-) .
I'll check the work in svn out, but since it's done, here's what I've done:
and the validating feed:
Lloyd Budd wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Kevin Newman <CaptainN at unfocus.com> wrote:
>> I made this Atom Feed (attached), and thought I'd share it back to the
>> community. It could use a bit of cleanup, and is generally not optimal
>> in places, but it does validate. I'd love to finish this up and
>> integrate it with Word Press better, maybe even implement the Atom API
>> for updating (if I understand the API correctly).
>> I did a little searching the archives for mention of Atom, and it seemed
>> the conclusion was that Atom in general is pretty DOA, is that still the
>> prevailing view? Any other thoughts?
> Hi Kevin,
> There was no attachment, but if I understand you properly, you are
> likely duplicating functionality that is either already implemented or
> being worked on. Download WordPress trunk
> Thanks for participating!
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers