[wp-hackers] UTW and WordPress

[Aaron Brazell]

I'll meet the rest of you in the middle and say that I like the idea  
of using the schema. At that point, UTW is so feature rich to almost  
be the antithesis of what WordPress is (and I am proud to have used  
'antithesis' in a sentence!). So if we want to build from the schema,  
I'd be on board for that. But it will be hard, after that, to  
separate feature from bloat and still maintain UTW's... well UTWishness.
--
Aaron Brazell
Technology Manager, b5media
"A Global New Media Company"

web:: www.b5media.com, www.technosailor.com
phone:: 410-608-6620
skype:: technosailor


On Apr 15, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Robert Deaton wrote:

> On 4/15/07, Aaron Brazell <abrazell at b5media.com> wrote:
>> A big, whopping "Hell No" from me. UTW is well respected, yes. It
>> does many things, yes. However, in recent months we've experienced
>> the following problems:
>>
>> 1) Artificial pageview inflation
>> 2) Broken Search
>> 3) Tags eaten
>> 4) Permalink issues
>
> And at the same time, UTW has never had the plethora of coders looking
> over its source as it would if it were checked into WP proper. I for
> one, would easily spend a bit of time running through the source
> scanning for bugs or poor coding if UTW were to go into the tree. I
> don't think its history can be reason for not adapting it into the WP
> core. I mean, by that measure, we'd have to strip out WordPress itself
> from WordPress. ;-).
>
>
> -- 
> --Robert Deaton
> http://lushlab.com
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers