Replying to Lloyd (was RE: db tables + file system
directory limitations was( Re:[wp-hackers] State of WP ))
computerguru at neosmart.net
Mon Apr 9 21:29:17 GMT 2007
I believe each list defines its own netiquette, and that this is just the
"wp-hackers way" of doing things...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
> bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd Budd
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:03 AM
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Subject: Re: Replying to Lloyd (was RE: db tables + file system
> directory limitations was( Re:[wp-hackers] State of WP ))
> On 4/9/07, Brian Layman <Brian at thecodecave.com> wrote:
> > Lloyd wrote:
> > > I think it is less a matter of thead vs flat, and more about as
> > > as possible keeping a "thread" on a particular topic -- at least if
> > > you want anyone other than those passionately following a whole
> > > discussion to be able to contribute as the discussion meanders
> > > topics ;-)
> > It's better than slight changes to the title with every single post.
> > you don't know what goes where, because even Outlook groups emails
> > subject.
> > Anyway, I think we were still pretty close to Kevin's original topic
> of what
> > infrastructure would best suit his needs. It was all conversation
> > needed to happen and furthered his understanding (I hope) of the
> > involved.
> > IMHO
> > Cheers Lloyd,
> Whatever suits you, but an emails with subject like "Replying to
> Lloyd" or "State of WP" I am a lot less likely to read or continue to
> follow on a developer mailing list because it does not follow mailing
> list netiquette.
> Lloyd Budd | Digital Entomologist | 250-885-1744
> WordPress.com | WordPress.org | Automattic.com
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers