[wp-hackers] XMLRPC and the patch

[Peter Westwood]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Charles wrote:
>> I would expect the main reason why this patch has lingered is the
>> majority of the developers who hang around trac and this list don't
>> use xml-rpc to post...
> 
> Wow, it's a surprise to me that most people here don't use external editors.
> 

It isn't to me. It they did I don't think we would have seen so many
issues in the past with people finding XML-RPC editing broken.


>> Can you suggest a free client that we can use to test the patch
>> that uses this API? Or even better a number of clients we can test?
> 
> Doesn't "everything" use this API?  Just from memory, Windows Live Writer,
> Performancing, RocketPost, NetNewsWire, Qumana, MarsEdit, and Ecto.
> 

Do forget we support more than one API.  We support Movable Type,
Metaweblog and Blogger. According to the RSD we prefer Movable Type

westi
- --
Peter Westwood
http://blog.ftwr.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFML9yVPRdzag0AcURAoVwAKC3b3tVTCeWZ39pbNtDUWHglZMnPQCgnGHd
I/OUbjgp0Jl2MUXN9TEmB7A=
=DGpV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----