<div class="gmail_quote">Re licences: </div><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Not wishing to start yet another GPL related flamefest; I just want to point out that Creative Commons licences are not, in general, compatible with the GNU GPL, so leave those for content only, and stick with GPL for code. <a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses</a> </div>
<div>Also you must always specify which CC licence, there are many, and they are not all the same. <a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#which-cc">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#which-cc</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Secondly, </div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote">On 10 September 2010 02:34, James Groom <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jimgroom@gmail.com" target="_blank">jimgroom@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div> ... ethics that should always undergird open source projects (i.e. owned by no one) I think this is groovy. </div>
<div><br></div><div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>both Create Commons and GPL *only* work (i.e. are legally enforcable) if someone/something owns the copyright. They are all based on the copyright owner licensing you to use the work in a certain way.</div>
<div><br></div><br clear="all">Mike<br>-- <br>Mike Little<br><a href="http://zed1.com/" target="_blank">http://zed1.com/</a><br><br>