I think this brings to light sort of a fair question. Should the Codex consist only of officially supported functionality?<br><br>post_is_in_descendant_category() springs to mind. It's provided as an example in the <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/in_category#post_is_in_descendant_category_function">in_category()</a> article. Do we pull it out or leave it in as an alternative, unsupported function?<br>
<br>Drew<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, John Blackbourn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnbillion@gmail.com" target="_blank">johnbillion@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 11 November 2012 14:06, Manuel Schmalstieg <<a href="mailto:webdev@ms-studio.net">webdev@ms-studio.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> There are some functions for that, change_post_object_label() and<br>
> change_post_menu_label().<br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> Is there any reason why this information isn't in the Codex?<br>
<br>
</div>Neither of these functions are present in WordPress. They are<br>
functions that people have written themselves and posted to the sites<br>
you linked to. There is no reason they would be on the Codex.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
John<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
wp-docs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wp-docs@lists.automattic.com">wp-docs@lists.automattic.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs" target="_blank">http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>"News is something someone wants suppressed. Everything else is just advertising."<br>-- Lord Northcliff<a href="http://www.timberlinegardens.com" target="_blank"></a><br>
</div>