<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/5/12 11:42 AM, Marc Beneteau
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CADZaJgPD202CrV6TcYjMvsYu9Wafc7hgRX7_BrYuABy5BW3KdA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Sorry
          Jane I am now confused.<span style="">&nbsp;
          </span>"that is what the support group is working on </span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://svnbook.red-bean.com/">http://svnbook.red-bean.com/</a></span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">"&#8230;
          you
          mean the Codex people (this list)?<span style="">&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Or
          is this a separate group?<span style="">&nbsp; </span>I want to be
          invited to that.</span></p>
    </blockquote>
    There's no special invitation, you just start contributing. The
    group is at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://make.wordpress.org/support">http://make.wordpress.org/support</a>. That includes both
    support forums and documentation. The Codex is the existing
    documentation. The handbooks are the new documentation project they
    are working on there. Review the history on the blog there for more
    information. This list (along with the forums list) is
    semi-deprecated in favor of the blog, which is more accessible to
    potential contributors. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CADZaJgPD202CrV6TcYjMvsYu9Wafc7hgRX7_BrYuABy5BW3KdA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">&nbsp;I
          have stuff to contribute but I am not very interested in
          working on a
          legacy platform, I hope that's clear now, </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    It's been clear from your first email, as has been our disinterest
    in pursuing the windows-style platform you prefer.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CADZaJgPD202CrV6TcYjMvsYu9Wafc7hgRX7_BrYuABy5BW3KdA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">and
          also I disagree with you "</span><span style=""> the SVN book
          is just HTML</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">
          ", the
          organization of the topics is crucial, </span></p>
    </blockquote>
    Yes, but the organization of topics is CONTENT, not PLATFORM.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CADZaJgPD202CrV6TcYjMvsYu9Wafc7hgRX7_BrYuABy5BW3KdA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">and
          also the decision of whether this is
          going to context-sensitive help inside the dashboard</span></p>
    </blockquote>
    Documentation and core ux are two different things. Changing the way
    help is treated in the dashboard would go through the core team.
    Nacin is the release lead, and 3.5 is already in beta, so
    suggestions for new features will probably be taken in January at
    the beginning of the 3.6 cycle. But again, there is nothing stopping
    you from making a plugin that does things exactly the way you want
    them, and releasing that. If someone who hasn't contributed to core
    before wants to make suggestions to change the core ux/ui, having a
    publicly released plugin that does what is being suggested will get
    more attention than someone just coming in cold and saying "I think
    you should do x". <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>