[HyperDB] WP 2.7 testing?
lists.automattic.com at callum-macdonald.com
Thu Feb 5 02:11:52 GMT 2009
HyperDB is only really applicable to super high traffic clusters, so it
wouldn't make sense to distribute by default.
I'm a MultiDB developer so I'm also biased, I think it's more
appropriate for a mid-size site. I think HyperDB is better for wp.com
type scale, but for the "average" WPMU site, I think MultiDB has an
Cheers - Callum.
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 13:21 -0600, Jed Barish wrote:
> I just wanted to make sure that the hyperdb continues to be updated not left
> behind later on. Why don't hyperdb integrated with WPMU/WP 2.7 by default?
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Barry Abrahamson <barry at automattic.com>wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Jed Barish wrote:
> > Glad to hear that it worked very well. How would you compare to Multi-DB
> >> from WPMU Dev group with HyperDB ?
> > Better, but I may be biased.
> > --
> > Barry Abrahamson | Systems Wrangler | Automattic
> > Blog: http://barry.wordpress.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > HyperDB mailing list
> > HyperDB at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/hyperdb
> HyperDB mailing list
> HyperDB at lists.automattic.com
More information about the HyperDB